Are Developed Economies Fiscally Sustainable?
This edition examines the fiscal
sustainability of developed economies. The context is that before the crisis
there were already structural problems that had caused government deficits to
expand such as aging populations, growing welfare programs, lack of spending
discipline, etc. Then came the crisis.
The global financial crisis required massive stimulus measures to attempt to
limit the damage. For the time being it appears to have worked (beyond the scope
of this article). But on the fiscal sustainability front this has taken what was
already a huge problem and, without right action, could set developed nations
and (through the deadly force of contagion) the world on a course to the next
crisis; called 'sovereign default'.
The consequences of inaction could well be financial ruin, and when governments
go bankrupt; who bails them out? In the usual format, the following 5 graphs
will be examined for insights as regards this issue. At the conclusion the
options for developed nations will be listed, and the implications for those
reading will be highlighted.
1. Fiscal Balances:
Advanced versus Emerging Economies
The chart below, from the IMF, shows data back to the 70's, through most of
history the norm was deficits (so we're not really dealing with a new
phenomenon, but the dynamics have changed). The history was also that developed
nations tended to have lower deficits than emerging nations (greater tax revenue
base, less spending required on infrastructure, less volatility of leadership,
etc).

The reality and forecast is that developed nations will likely be spending more
time in deficits greater than those of emerging markets, this is partly due to
better growth prospects. The interesting thing to note is how this ties in with
the other part of the equation; government borrowing...
2. Public Debt:
Advanced versus Emerging Economies
Generally as you spend money, sometimes you need to borrow, the idea is that you
borrow a little, then pay it back. But as you will see below, the advanced
economies missed the point and you have a steady climb in the level of public
debt as a percentage of GDP. This is where it gets nasty. As with personal
finances - if you find yourself with a large credit card balance, it's very
difficult to get rid of it as more of your surplus income (if any) goes to
paying interest rather than principal.

The same applies here, as debt increases, so does interest expense (and
therefore the level of deficits), and well, (yes it has to be said...) as
deficits increase, so too does borrowing! This is sometimes referred to as a
vicious cycle - and is not reserved for over-leveraged consumers.
The last point to make is the emerging vs developed distinction; who's in the
better fiscal position?
3. Fiscal Balances: The
G7
In aggregation of data you lose detail, so lets look at the fiscal balance for
the main G7 countries. The UK (and lesser so, the US) managed a brief period of
surpluses, but as a group, unsurprisingly, spent most of their time in deficits.
And Japan, in the red, with the higher deficit figures, is unsurprisingly also
the one with the highest debt levels.

The key takeout from this chart is that if these nations go on, business as
usual, debt levels will continue to climb, and external shocks like the
financial crisis will cause stresses. The global financial crisis caused a blow
out in deficits, which has caused borrowings to jump. So what? well, first of
all - can debt levels keep growing forever? and second of all, if your credit
card is maxed out, and you have an emergency, what do you do?
4. Government Debt: The
Eurozone
Already, we've seen an example in the Eurozone
in the form of Greece. The outlook is for further increasing debt levels. There
is the backstop of the EU rules on government debt and fiscal balance limits,
but still the pressures are building.

Driving much of the increase in Euro Area government debt is the UK. The UK has
come out with a lot of damage following the crisis, and will have a hard time
getting back to growth let alone a sustainable fiscal position. Indeed, in the
next chart we'll see that the UK faces the largest gap between current deficits
and where it needs to be to stop its debt
5. The Gap Between
Spending and Borrowing
This graph shows analysis done by the IMF (with no. 4. as an extra calculation).
It shows, in the red, actual primary structural balance, as a percentage of GDP,
as you'd expect Japan, UK, US have the larger figures. The black and the gray
are where it needs to be to stop debt from growing further (or stabilization).

Probing in further, the light blue bars show the gap between where the deficit
is and where it should be to prevent further debt growth. These be large
hurdles.
What are the options?
Staff at the IMF recently put out a
paper on how to renormalize
fiscal and monetary policy, for those with more than a passing interest, I
suggest reading this. It outlines some of the options and consequences. But for
a basic inventory:
a. Do Nothing: Carry on business as
usual and hope for the best; this could work out over time if growth supports
tax revenue and sees a lower deficit or surplus. But otherwise debt levels would
continue to grow until lenders decided not to lend anymore. Interest rates would
likely rise, and private sector will probably be crowded out. If debt got too
high a credit rating downgrade could happen and catalyse a loss of confidence
culminating in a currency, interest rate, and sovereign default crisis.
b. Print Money: Monetise the deficit,
pay down your debt with printed money; this would reduce debt levels, but the
cost would be increased inflation. At the extreme there would be hyperinflation,
and very high nominal interest rates. The problem is, it's really a bad look if
a developed economy starts to look like a Zimbabwe.
c. Cut Spending & Raise Taxes:
Fiscal discipline is a good recipe for for lowering deficits, and perhaps
finding your way into surpluses and therefore chipping away at government
borrowing levels. The cost? a pretty significant drag on growth. Let's face it,
you'd need pretty significant tax hikes and spending cuts for places like the US
and UK. The growth outlook is already reasonably subdued, so if you add this,
things don't look pretty.
What are the implications?
The consequences of the scenarios above require adjustments to strategy. For
example if "a." was the option then you could just carry on as usual
too, and hope that the sky doesn't fall - or you could carry on as usual but
think about options to hedge against the worst case scenario of a developed
economy sovereign debt crisis.
For the debt monetization
option, obviously you'd need to think about inflation hedges such as real estate
and commodities. You'd also have to think about where best to keep your currency
(inflation is another way of saying a weakening currency).
For the final option, this would probably feed into asset allocation decisions
on a country basis. The main consequence in the short term would be lower
growth, so on a macro basis you'd look for places where growth may be higher in
the near term. Though, longer term as debt levels were contained, growth levels
would probably return in developed nations.
Overall, there is a problem in terms of fiscal sustainability and government
borrowing in most of the major developed economies. The key is to understand the
issues and implications so that you can vote politically in the right way
(though maybe this is optimistic), and more importantly you can vote with your
money in the right way.
Sources:
1. IMF World Economic Outlook http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2009/02/index.htm
2. IMF World Economic Outlook http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2009/02/index.htm
3. OECD Economic
Outlook http://www.oecd.org/document/61/0,3343,en_2649_34573_2483901_1_1_1_1,00.html
4. OECD Economic
Outlook http://www.oecd.org/document/61/0,3343,en_2649_34573_2483901_1_1_1_1,00.html
5. IMF World Economic Outlook http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2009/02/index.htm
Article Source: http://www.econgrapher.com/fiscal30dec.html
